|
|
SHOTS FAKED?
In July 1969, more than 600 million people watched in awe, as Neil Armstrong became the first man to walk on the surface of the moon. The last men to set foot on the moon were the astronauts of Apollo 17, in December 1972. But even before this, a set of conspiracy theories were spreading, the most radical of which claimed that NASA had faked all the lunar landings-that man in fact never landed on the moon. Look at the evidence and decide for yourself.
This
shot of Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin planting the US flag on the moon's
surface was taken by a 16 mm camera mounted on the lunar module. Aldrin's shadow
(A) is far longer than Armstrong's. Yet the only light on the moon - and the
only light source used by NASA - comes from the sun, and should not create such
unequal shadows.
Buzz Aldrin stands with the sun shining down across his left shoulder. Although his right side is in shadow, there is too much detail shown on that side of his space suit (B). It should be much darker and less visible because the contrast between light and dark is much greater on the moon. With no atmosphere to pollute the light on the moon, all the photographs should look bright and crisp. But the landscape behind Aldrin (C) gradually fades to darkness. This 'fall-off' effect, hoax theorists say, should not occur on the moon. But the fading effect could have happened because film is less adaptive than the human eye and makes objects seem darker the further they are from the camera. There is a curious object reflected in Aldrin's visor (D). Some theorists think that it is a helicopter, others say that it is a 12-metre glass structure. NASA claims that it is a piece of equipment on the lunar surface.
NASA claims the strange shape
(E) - in this shot taken from the Lunar Module while it was 95 km above the moon's surface - is a shadow cast by the Command Module's rocket. But when larger aircraft fly at lower altitudes over the Earth, they do not cast such huge and defined shadows.
As the Lunar Module Antares, from Apollo 14, rests on the moon's surface there is no crater beneath its feet
(F), despite the considerable amount of dust that would have been thrown up during its descent. There also appears to be a footprint (G) directly under the module, yet no one walked on this part of the moon before the craft landed. On the left side of the craft, the words, 'United States' (H) are clearly visible, whereas they should be in shadow. Buzz Aldrin himself said that there is no refracted light on the moon, which points to the fact that another source of light was used to take this shot.
These shots of John Young and James Irwin - like many Apollo photos - show a lunar sky without stars
(J). Yet with no atmosphere on the moon, stars should be visible - a fact confirmed by Maria Blyzinsky, Curator of Astronomy at the Greenwich Observatory, London. If NASA could not hope to recreate the lunar sky, they may have opted for simple black backdrops. NASA claim that the sunlight was so strong it overpowered the light from the stars. On the shadow side of the landing modules, there are plaques (K)
As Alan Bean holds up a Special Environmental Sample Container, the top of his head is clearly in view. But the camera taking the shot was fixed on Charles Conrad's chest, and the ground here seems to be level, so the top of the helmet
(L) should not be in the photo. Shadows visible in Al Bean's visor should not be in the photo. Shadows visible in Al Bean's visor (M) go off in various directions, not in straight parallel lines, as expected, suggesting that there is more than one light source. The container Bean is holding (N) is brightly lit at the bottom, yet it is facing away from the light. This may be due to the light reflected from Bean's suit on to the container, but the rest of the container is not so brightly lit.
In this photograph of John Young readjusting an antenna next to the Lunar Rover Vehicle (LRV), there is a marker, known as a cross-hair (inset)
(P), that goes behind the LRV's equipment. These cross-hairs (Q), which appear on all the lunar photographs, are made by a screen of cross-hairs placed between the shutter and the film. The bright, reflected light may have obliterated the fine line of this one, or it could have happened if the image was retouched. The foreground shows what looks like the letter 'C' on a boulder (R). Is this perhaps an identification letter left on a studio prop? The letter C on the original photo is actually quite well defined and it is hard to imagine what can cause such a well-laid inscription on a boulder in a desolate place such as the moon. The tracks made by the LRV's wheel turn rather oddly at right-angles (S). These tracks could have been caused by studio technicians pushing the buggy into place. Such clear tracks and footprints require moisture to form and should not appear on the dry lunar surface.
| THE CONSPIRACY THEORISTS |
EXCLUSIVE WITNESS |
| The two leading
supporters of the faked moon photograph theory come from either side of
the Atlantic. Ralph René, an author from New Jersey, argues that Man
never flew to the moon. He believes the radiation from the sun is so
deadly that astronauts would fry as soon as they got into deep space. In
his book 'NASA Mooned America!' René claims that the Apollo
pictures were shot in a government studio near the town of Mercury in
Nevada.
Englishmen David Percy, on the other hand, uses his experience as a professional photographer to put forward the argument that the lighting in the Apollo photographs could only have been achieved in a studio on earth. He also claims to have an informant in NASA, whom he calls Whistleblower, who has leaked information about the cover-up.
|
Buzz Aldrin Aldrin was the second man to walk on the moon. Here's what he had to say about the claims that the Apollo photographs were faked.
"There has always been an undercurrent of queries about the conspiracy. But they are sensational fabrications and I don't put much into any of it. I appreciate he attention they draw - it's helpful in keeping the space promises on people's minds - but it's very erroneous and misleading and selfishly irresponsible. by the people concerned."
How do you feel when people say you and Neil Armstrong never went to the moon?
"Well it's a waste of my time. I don't have much respect for the people who entertain that thinking and generally am not interested in engaging in any discourse with them. All that does is encourage them and it's not going to change their thinking at all."
An interesting speech reversal can be found on Neil Armstrong's legendary 'One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind' statement. When played backwards Neil seems to say 'Man never space walk.' |
Certain aspects of the shots - the highlighted flags, the Lunar Modules without craters, the camera's cross-hair disappearing behind the image, the abnormally distinct tyre tracks and the footprints - are difficult to explain away completely. But perhaps the most intriguing question is why the photographs may have been faked, regardless of whether or not Man actually did land on the moon. Why would NASA fake the Apollo moon-landing shots?
THIS SITE IS MAINTAINED BY RAJEEV BELLANI